Creachanoid 2025-03-29 19:30:52

My favorite little quirk about AI gen images is that they produce what is essentially the average of a given input based on the entirety of their available data set. Meaning that what you see is the most boiled down common denominator. Like those old memes about taking the average photo of 100s of pro baseball players faces and the result being "Joe Baseball". A prime example of the most average output is that if you ask an AI to generate an image of a clock face at any other time other than 10:10, the hands on the clock face will always display that time no matter what time you ask for. This is because when selling watches or taking photos of clocks, this time specifically and a few chosen others are the most aesthetically pleasing. Same goes for generating images of a full glass of wine spilling over. Images of half full or even less full glasses are more prevalent due to them looking the most appealing. It can't adapt into what it doesn't know, only what it has been fed. Things like this makes AI extremely easy to spot since the AI results will always be the most average and look just the way they are expected to look. Then on top of this, there are some AI bros that will feed AI to AI in the hopes of producing "Better" results. Garbage in only results in garbage out. Not too worried about AI, everything involved with it is sort of just eating each other already.

Nitgo 2025-03-29 20:14:21

Ngl, I believe that AI in the past few years has gotten much better than we thought it possibly could, and quickly too. It's only a matter of time till it actually starts replacing artists, which sucks. AI is already being used so often in the corporate world, that it almost feels like now artists are only considered when AI fails to create what the person wants.